The Center for Strategic and International Studies published its International Energy Outlook 2016 on May 11, 2016.
A reference to the www.eia.gov follows the tag line “Independent Statistics & Analysis”. I’m all for that! What’s not to like?
What is fascinating about this report is that it actually makes a forecast out to 2040. Most forecasts done to date stop at 2030, a date corresponding to the new Clean Power Plan (CPP) and other advertised Climate Change initiatives.
The report breaks down energy use between OECD and Non-OECD countries 35%/65%, as can be seen in the chart, shown below. The comment identifies most of the increased energy use in the Non-OECD countries.
![](https://base-e.net/website_85060ba1/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/35-65-1024x573.jpg)
The report further breaks down the energy related CO2e intensity of energy use, expressed in kilograms CO2 per million Btu, again, between OECD and Non-OECD countries. Those values are 49 kg-CO2/mmBtu for the OECD and 55kg-CO2/mmBtu, respectively and as indicated on the chart below.
The weighted average intensity is 52.9 kg-CO2/mmBtu.
![](https://base-e.net/website_85060ba1/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/OECD-Non-OECD-1024x577.jpg)
The interesting part of this report is that, unlike others, the forecast includes projections to 2040, with the impact of the new Clean Power Plan.
![](https://base-e.net/website_85060ba1/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/2040-Forecast-1024x551.jpg)
I have “eye-balled” these charts and have estimated this is 820 Quad, which at 52.9 kg-CO2/mmBtu is 43.4Gt of CO2 from the energy sector. The report says 43 and 815 Quads.
I plotted this forecast value on the previously published chart of scenarios from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) AR5 review, shown below.
![](https://base-e.net/website_85060ba1/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/1924491697AR5-Scenarios.jpg)
The summary conclusions in the report state that 75% of energy use in 2040 will come from fossil fuel.
The unavoidable conclusions are:
- The world is not even close to where it needs to be on prevention
- We are on an increasing trajectory and headed toward 4°C, if we are lucky
- The CPP contribution is minimal and only affects Coal
- Natural Gas generation is unaffected by CPP, since it has a waiver on its “½ of Coal” emissions
- We are not yet being honest with ourselves
- President Obama does not know this
The EIA presentation is available here:
https://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/sieminski_05112016.pdf